Tuvok
Lieutenant J.G.
Posts: 27
|
Post by Tuvok on Jun 28, 2005 16:48:10 GMT -5
I am planning on going to see the remake of King Kong when it is released. I have never seen the original 1933 version and was wondering if i should see it before I see the remake.
|
|
Wolf =/\= Trek
WILL BE PERMANENTLY BANNED AFTER 1,500 POSTS
Trek on........... =/\=
Posts: 1,032
|
Post by Wolf =/\= Trek on Jun 29, 2005 5:31:20 GMT -5
yes see the original it is lame but good.
|
|
GeneralChoasmajormayhem
Guest
|
Post by GeneralChoasmajormayhem on Jan 18, 2006 1:59:21 GMT -5
Wolfie, the original version of King Kong (1933) . Is a classic movie . In the same class Dracula with Bela Lugosi ,or The Pit and the pendulum. You tend to spend to much time with your head up your a$$.
To define lame, well Big brother comes to mind Star trek TNG comes to mind and your posts , there spam . You need to get an education as well as a life .
|
|
Wolf =/\= Trek
WILL BE PERMANENTLY BANNED AFTER 1,500 POSTS
Trek on........... =/\=
Posts: 1,032
|
Post by Wolf =/\= Trek on Jan 18, 2006 8:13:23 GMT -5
pardon me............
the original King Kong is lame in a good way
|
|
|
|
Post by Ole Star Killer ,El rednecks on Jan 25, 2006 9:16:04 GMT -5
The 1979 remake of King Kong is lame , The more recent updated version pays tribute to the original by keeping itself set in the time period of New york 1930's .
The 1979 version failed because it tried to update in to the modern world .
|
|
Wolf =/\= Trek
WILL BE PERMANENTLY BANNED AFTER 1,500 POSTS
Trek on........... =/\=
Posts: 1,032
|
Post by Wolf =/\= Trek on Jan 25, 2006 10:46:12 GMT -5
Agreed the 79 version did nothing for me
|
|
